Posts

Showing posts with the label temporary injunction

Must Read

M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb, 1964

Image
M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb, (1964) 6 SCR 642, 651 This case interpretation/case summary is written by Ms. Swati Sharma a student at the Faculty of Law (Delhi University). If you also want to publish your articles or case interpretations/summaries, send your work to  niyamskanoon09@gmail.com . Case Details PETITIONER:  MRS. M. N. CLUBWALA AND ANR. Vs. RESPONDENT: FIDA HUSSAIN SAHEB AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/02/1964 BENCH: MUDHOLKAR, J.R. SUBBARAO, K. CITATION: 1965 AIR 610 1964 SCR (6) 642 Introduction   The case of M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb (1964) under the Delhi Rent Control Act is a landmark judgment that clarifies the distinction between a lease and a license and the jurisdiction of the Rent Controller. The primary issue in this case was whether the agreements between the landlord (M.N. Clubwala) and the shopkeepers (Fida Hussain Saheb) created a lease or a license.  Facts of the Case M.N. Clubwala (Landlord) used his building as market by
Post a Comment
Read more

MANOHAR LAL CHOPRA v. RAI BAHADUR RAO RAJA SETH HIRALAL (1962)

Image
MANOHAR LAL v. SETH HIRALAL Case Summary (1962) INTRODUCTION This case deals with the concept of Temporary Injunction and its application. A temporary injunction is a legal remedy that restrains temporarily a party from performing certain act .  As per section 94(c) of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, the court may grant a temporary injunction.  FACTS OF THE CASE The appellant and the respondent had a partnership firm in the name of 'Diamond Industries' for working coal mines and manufacture of cement at Indore. Later, the partnership was dissolved by a deed and it was agreed that the appellant will render true accounts of the said business. The appellant was entitled to RS 1 lakh but he could get that amount only after the account of the firm had been rendered, checked and audited. The 2nd proviso of the deed also contained that all disputes and differences shall be decided amicably or in court at Indore and nowhere else. 2 months later the respondent sent a registered letter t
Post a Comment
Read more