Posts

Showing posts with the label sub judice

Must Read

M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb, 1964

Image
M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb, (1964) 6 SCR 642, 651 This case interpretation/case summary is written by Ms. Swati Sharma a student at the Faculty of Law (Delhi University). If you also want to publish your articles or case interpretations/summaries, send your work to  niyamskanoon09@gmail.com . Case Details PETITIONER:  MRS. M. N. CLUBWALA AND ANR. Vs. RESPONDENT: FIDA HUSSAIN SAHEB AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/02/1964 BENCH: MUDHOLKAR, J.R. SUBBARAO, K. CITATION: 1965 AIR 610 1964 SCR (6) 642 Introduction   The case of M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb (1964) under the Delhi Rent Control Act is a landmark judgment that clarifies the distinction between a lease and a license and the jurisdiction of the Rent Controller. The primary issue in this case was whether the agreements between the landlord (M.N. Clubwala) and the shopkeepers (Fida Hussain Saheb) created a lease or a license.  Facts of the Case M.N. Clubwala (Landlord) used his building as market by
Post a Comment
Read more

Indian Bank v. Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd, AIR 1998

Image
Introduction   This case is related to  the  Doctrine of Sub Judice or section 10 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.   Relevant Section Section 10, Civil Procedure Code 1908 Facts  Respondent (Maharashtra State Cooperative Marketing Federation Ltd.) applies to the appellant bank to open an irrevocable letter of credit for a sum of 3,78,90,000 /- in favor of 'Shankar Rice Mill'. Under the request, the Bank opened an irrevocable letter of credit. It is agreed that the documents drawn under the said letter of credit when tendered to the appellant bank were to be forwarded to the federation for their acceptance thereafter the bank had to make payment to 'Shankar Rice Mill' on behalf of the federation. The bank filed a summary suit in the Bombay High Court under Order 37 of the code against the federation for obtaining a decree, stating that said amount has become revocable.  The Federation/Respondent Contention   Before filing a summary suit, there was already i
Post a Comment
Read more