Posts

Showing posts with the label Inherent power of the Court

Must Read

M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb, 1964

Image
M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb, (1964) 6 SCR 642, 651 This case interpretation/case summary is written by Ms. Swati Sharma a student at the Faculty of Law (Delhi University). If you also want to publish your articles or case interpretations/summaries, send your work to  niyamskanoon09@gmail.com . Case Details PETITIONER:  MRS. M. N. CLUBWALA AND ANR. Vs. RESPONDENT: FIDA HUSSAIN SAHEB AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/02/1964 BENCH: MUDHOLKAR, J.R. SUBBARAO, K. CITATION: 1965 AIR 610 1964 SCR (6) 642 Introduction   The case of M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb (1964) under the Delhi Rent Control Act is a landmark judgment that clarifies the distinction between a lease and a license and the jurisdiction of the Rent Controller. The primary issue in this case was whether the agreements between the landlord (M.N. Clubwala) and the shopkeepers (Fida Hussain Saheb) created a lease or a license.  Facts of the Case M.N. Clubwala (Landlord) used his building as market by
Post a Comment
Read more

Mahant Ram Dass v. Mahant Ganga Dass, AIR 1961

Image
  Introduction This case talks about the scope of ' I nherent power ' which has been provided to the Court under Section 151 of ' Civil Procedure code 1908 ' to administer justice between parties. In this case we will know that a Court has the power to increase the time duration fixed by an earlier decision of a Court to do certain act, by exercising its inherent power under S.151, CPC. Facts Mahant Ram, the plaintiff filed a suit in the Court of Sub-ordinate Judge II, Gaya for a declaration that he had been nominated as 'Mahant of Moughal Juan Sangat' by his guru Mahant Gulab Das by a registered deed therefore he has the right to manage the Sangat and other offshoots. Case History  The trial court dismissed the suit. In an appeal by the plaintiff in the High Court ,  the Court made decision in his favour with the condition that he has to pay the court fee for the trial court and the HC within three months (April 8, 1954-July 8, 1954)  otherwise t
Post a Comment
Read more