Niyamskanoon

Posts

Top 10 landmark judgement given by justice D.Y. Chandrachud

Top 10 Landmark Judgements of the D.Y. Chandrachud as Supreme Court Judge Chief Justice of India Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud is known for his transformative role in Indian jurisprudence, blending a deep understanding of constitutional values with a progressive outlook on human rights and technology. Appointed as the 50th Chief Justice of India , he has a distinguished career marked by landmark judgments on privacy, equality, and individual freedoms. Justice Chandrachud’s tenure has focused on making the judiciary more accessible and transparent through digital reforms, promoting live streaming of court hearings, and enabling e-filing to bring justice closer to citizens. His judicial philosophy emphasizes upholding democratic values, protecting civil liberties, and enhancing social justice. Here are some of the landmark judgments he has delivered that showcase his commitment to a fair, inclusive, and rights- centered judiciary. Ayodhya Dispute Case (M. Siddiq v. Mahant Suresh Da

Kamla Devi (Smt) v. Vasdev, AIR 1995 This case interpretation/case summary is written by Ms. Swati Sharma a student at the Faculty of Law (Delhi University) and edited by Mr. Sonu Choudhary . If you also want to publish your articles or case interpretations/summaries, send your work to niyamskanoon09@gmail.com . Case Details PETITIONER : KAMLA DEVI Vs. RESPONDENT : VASDEV DATE OF JUDGMENT : 14/12/1994 BENCH : SEN, S.C. (J) BENCH : SEN, S.C. (J) VERMA, JAGDISH SARAN (J) BHARUCHA S.P. (J) CITATION : 1995 AIR 985 1995 SCC (1) 356 JT 1995 (1) 142 1994 SCALE (5)295 Introduction The case of Kamla Devi v. Vasdev 1995 is a significant judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India in 1995. This case deals with the interesting issue of whether the rent controller can forgive

Sirsilk Ltd. v. Government of Andhra Pradesh (1964) 2 SCR 448: AIR 1964 SC 160 This case interpretation/case summary is written by Mr. Sonu Choudhary , a student at the Faculty of Law (Delhi University) . If you also want to publish your articles or case interpretations/summaries, send your work to niyamskanoon09@gmail.com . Introduction We all have read Section 17(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 which places an obligation on the appropriate Government to publish the report or award made by any board or labour court or tribunal within 30 days of receiving such report or award. Also, we are well acquainted with Section 18(1) of the same Act which had been introduced by Act 36 of 1956. This, Section 18(1), states that any settlement made between the parties shall be binding to them. In the present case, a very interesting issue has come before the Apex court whereby a conflict between both the sections i.e. s.18(1) & s.17(1) has been raised. So please read this case summary

Gulshan Prakash v. State of Haryana (2010) 1 SCC 477||Case Summary Introduction In this appeal, the Court has interpreted Article 15(4) of the Fundamental Right. It has been added by the 1st Amendment Act, of 1951. Facts The State of Haryana instructed Maharshi Dayanand University (MDU), Rohtak to conduct entrance examination for MD/MS/PG courses for the Session 2008-2009. The appellant made a representation to the Health Secretary for providing reservation for SC and ST in the Post Graduate courses, Since there was no response from the Health Secretary the Appellant filed a petition in the High Court. The High Court dismissed the petition of the appellant therefore the appellant approached the Supreme Court by Special Leave Petition under Article 136. Appellant Contentions MDU, Rohtak has provided 20% reservation for the graduate level courses or undergraduate courses therefore the said University should also provide reservation in for the PG courses. The Government o

Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 2002||Case Summary Introduction In Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 2002 the Supreme Court reconsidered the decision of " Subhajit Tewary v. Union of India, 1975 in which the Court held that CSIR (Council of Scientific and Industrial Research) does not come under the definition of "State" as CSIR is not an authority within the meaning of Article 12 . Facts In Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 2002 the appellant approached the Supreme Court through Special Leave Petition under Article 136 to challenge the termination of his service by the Respondent 1 which is a unit of CSIR . As a result, the two-judge bench of the Supreme Court referred this case to a Constitution Bench being of the view that the case of Subhajit Tewary, 1975 required to reconsideration in which Subhajit, a Junior Stenographer filed a writ under Article 32 to claim eq

Som Prakash Rekhi v. Union of India, 1981||Case Summary Introduction In Som Prakash Rekhi v. Union of India, 1981 we will understand Article 12 of the Constitution of India which defines the term 'State' in a broad manner and will get to know it's better interpretation produced by the Apex Court. Facts A company named "Burmah Shell Oil Storage Ltd." a government company has been taken over by the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL) another government company under the Burmah Shell Act, 1976. The petitioner who was a clerk in the Burmah Shell Company, retired at the age of 50 was entitled to a qualifying pension and was also covered by the scheme under the Employees Provident Fund and Family Pension Act, 1952 which has been deducted by the BPCL on certain grounds as a result the Petitioner moved the Supreme Court under Article 32 while stating that the deduction from his original Pension (Rs.165.99) to Rs. 40.05 is inhuman and illegal and violation

The Food Corporation of India Staff Union v. Food Corporation of India & Ors, 1995 ||Case Summary Introduction In the present appeal, the Supreme Court of India laid down some norms and procedures to be followed to get the correct results by the "Secret Ballot System" which is the method to examine which is the more powerful Union. Facts There were two registered Trade Unions in an Industry consequently, a situation arose before the employers to understand which was an powerful union or with whom they should bargain regarding terms, conditions etc. As a result, In the present appeal, the Supreme Court of India laid down the procedure be executed to get the correct results by the Secret Ballot System. Issue What are the guidelines which laid down by the Court in the present appeal? Supreme Court Order The Court while understanding the importance of this issue, took opinions from other Trade Unions or Organizations before passing the following guideline

Sundarambal v. Government of Goa, Daman & Diu (1988) Case Study Introduction The case of Sundarambal v. Government of Goa, Daman & Diu is a significant judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of India in 1988. This case dealt with the issue of whether a teacher employed in a private school could be considered a "workman" under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Facts of the Case The appellant Sundarambal, a teacher employed in a private school, was terminated from her service and therefore sought relief under the Industrial Disputes Act, claiming that she was a workman and hence, entitled to protection under the Act. Case History The Petition was filed before the Conciliation Officer where Conciliation proceedings failed and the Conciliation officer reported this matter to the Government of Goa, Daman and Diu. The Government could not adjudicate this matter under section 10(1)(c) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 while holding that the appellant (Teacher) does not

Dharangadhara Chemical Works Ltd. v. State of Saurashtra Citation : AIR 1957 SC 264 F acts Dharangadhara Chemical Works Ltd. (the appellant) employed certain agarias at their salt works. The dispute arose regarding the conditions under which the agarias should be engaged by the appellant in the manufacture of salt. Therefore the dispute was presented before the Industrial Tribunal. Appellant Contentions The agarias were independent contractors and not workmen on the ground that the agarias had power to engage extra labour therefore the State was not competent to refer the present case for adjudication under Section 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act. Issue Whether the agarias are workmen within the meaning of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947? Case History The Industrial Tribunal favoured the respondent (Agarias) while holding that the Agarias are workmen within the meaning of the Act. The Labour Appellate Tribunal also while dismissing the appeal favoured the responden

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Maharashtra Minister Nawab Malik

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Maharashtra Minister Nawab Malik In a notable development in the ongoing legal battle involving Maharashtra Minister Nawab Malik, the Bombay High Court has granted him bail in the money laundering case that had led to his arrest. This decision marks a significant turn in the high-profile case that has seen extensive media coverage and political ramifications. Nawab Malik was arrested by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on charges of money laundering linked to a property deal allegedly involving proceeds of crime. The case against Malik included allegations of his involvement in financial transactions with individuals connected to the underworld, specifically those linked to the fugitive gangster Dawood Ibrahim. The bail application filed by Malik’s legal team argued that the charges against him were politically motivated and lacked substantial evidence. They contended that Malik had been cooperating with the investigation and that there was no risk of h

Kerala High Court Grants Bail to 19 Accused in Veterinary Student's Death

Kerala High Court Grants Bail to 19 Accused in Veterinary Student's Death In a case that has drawn significant public attention, the Kerala High Court has granted bail to all 19 accused in the tragic death of a veterinary student, citing insufficient evidence to support the charges of abetment to suicide. This decision has sparked a renewed debate on the judicial handling of sensitive cases involving allegations of harassment and mental health issues. The case revolves around the suicide of a young veterinary student, whose death was initially reported as a result of sustained harassment by her peers. The charges against the accused included severe allegations of bullying and mental torture, which allegedly led the student to take her own life. The incident had caused an outpouring of public grief and anger, leading to demands for stringent actions against the accused. The court's decision to grant bail was based on a detailed examination of the evidence presented by the prosec

Delhi Government Petitions Supreme Court Over Water Crisis

Delhi Government Petitions Supreme Court Over Water Crisis In a significant move addressing the severe water crisis, the Delhi government has approached the Supreme Court, seeking the release of additional water from neighboring states such as Haryana. This plea comes in response to the acute water shortage exacerbated by the current heatwave that has gripped the capital city. The petition filed by the Delhi government emphasizes the dire situation faced by its residents. The severe heatwave has led to an unprecedented demand for water, straining the existing water supply infrastructure. The Delhi government contends that immediate intervention is necessary to mitigate the crisis and ensure an uninterrupted water supply to its population. The petition outlines several key arguments. Firstly, it highlights the shared river water agreements between states, urging compliance with these agreements to ensure equitable distribution of water resources. Secondly, it stresses the need for neigh

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (Muster Roll) Case Summary Facts In this landmark case, the female workers employed on a muster roll basis by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) filed a petition seeking maternity benefits. The female workers argued that they should be entitled to the same maternity benefits as regular employees under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. Issue Whether female workers employed on a muster roll basis are entitled to maternity benefits under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961? Respondent's Contentions 1. Right to Maternity Benefits : The petitioners contended that the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, which provides maternity benefits to female workers, should be applicable to them despite their muster roll status. 2. Equality and Non-discrimination: They argued that the denial of maternity benefits to muster roll female workers was discriminatory and violated their right to equality under Article 14 and right to life and personal liberty

Search This Blog

Niyamskanoon

Posts

Must Read

M.N. Clubwala v. Fida Hussain Saheb, 1964

Top 10 landmark judgement given by justice D.Y. Chandrachud

Kamla Devi v. Vasdev, AIR 1995 SC 985

Sirsilk Ltd. v. Government of Andhra Pradesh (1964) 2 SCR 448: AIR 1964 SC 160

Gulshan Prakash v. State of Haryana (2010) 1 SCC477

Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, 2002

Som Prakash Rekhi v. Union of India (1981) 1 SCC 449

The Food Corporation of India Staff Union v. Food Corporation of India & Ors, AIR 1995 SC 1344.

A. Sundarambal v. Government of Goa, Daman & Diu AIR 1988 SC 1700

Dharangadhara Chemical Works Ltd. v. State of Saurashtra AIR 1957 SC 264 : 1957 SCR 152

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Maharashtra Minister Nawab Malik

Kerala High Court Grants Bail to 19 Accused in Veterinary Student's Death

Delhi Government Petitions Supreme Court Over Water Crisis

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Female Workers (Muster Roll) AIR 2000 SC 1274